Sunday, November 3, 2013
Bigfoot Hunter Shoots Friend
Thankfully, the victim is in stable condition, and so I don't feel bad saying: what a couple of goddamned idiots. Armed, hunting themselves a Sasquatch, something, according to the officer, "spooked" the shooter, who went off and shot his friend. No drugs or alcohol involved. Which means, devoid of being under the influence of anything, except obvious stupidity, these morons truly got what they deserved.
Monday, September 30, 2013
My Reminder Why I don't cotton to Bigfoot Evidence blog
Told myself some time ago I wouldn't take Bigfoot Evidence seriously, due to their gratuitous and gleeful animals eating animals porn. So I go over there just to see what I can see, not having been there for awhile. Sure enough, third post down or so, is a link and clip of a snake regurgitating a dog. Nice.
This has nothing to do with Sasquatch, and everything to do with jollies to get the yee haw crowd to join.
No, I'm not linking to the blog, but if you're excitable and want to see that crap for yourself, there's Google.
This has nothing to do with Sasquatch, and everything to do with jollies to get the yee haw crowd to join.
No, I'm not linking to the blog, but if you're excitable and want to see that crap for yourself, there's Google.
Sunday, September 29, 2013
On Cryptomundo: Justin Smeja Gives His Thoughts on Bigfoot
On Cryptomundo: Justin Smeja Gives His Thoughts on Bigfoot.
Another Bigfoot investigator who justifies the killing of a Sasquatch. Reasons really don't matter, because there is no reason. (Possilby self-defense, but that's another issue, and not one that concerns Mr. Smeja.)
Aside from my not unsurprising disagreement with Justin Smeja's quest to kill, is my response to the tone of his post. It's a bit unnerving, and borders, to my mind, on the uhinged. For one brief moment, forget about personal views on kill/no kill --- Smeja's seems truly off the rails.For example, Smeja's following comments concerning the "stupid argument to kill or not to kill."
Being "worked up" about killing a Sasquatch is hardly the pointless hobby of bored individuals. That thinking is certainly disingenuous. As to the analogy of spending lottery winnings on drugs, I say: WTF?!
Always difficult to say things about the things others say, because no one knows what goes on in someone's head. But, I'll say it anyway: no, Justin Smeja, you do not "waver back and forth some days I'm 1005 no kill." Because if you were 100% no kill, there'd be no wavering.
Another Bigfoot investigator who justifies the killing of a Sasquatch. Reasons really don't matter, because there is no reason. (Possilby self-defense, but that's another issue, and not one that concerns Mr. Smeja.)
Aside from my not unsurprising disagreement with Justin Smeja's quest to kill, is my response to the tone of his post. It's a bit unnerving, and borders, to my mind, on the uhinged. For one brief moment, forget about personal views on kill/no kill --- Smeja's seems truly off the rails.For example, Smeja's following comments concerning the "stupid argument to kill or not to kill."
This is a stupid arguement to kill or not to kill, if your that worked up about it you have too much time on your hands. Its like arguing its wrong for someone to spend all their money on drugs if they win the lottery (in my case twice). DNA is no longer good enough. Specially in this field. For the sake of time lets just assume that I know more about DNA results findings and protocols then 98 percent of you. Ive worked first hand with countless labs and doctors on this subject over the last 3 years. If a bodies drug in by a researcher tomorrow the blood of that individual is partly on melbas hands, because of her we need a body. We need a body not a sequence.
Being "worked up" about killing a Sasquatch is hardly the pointless hobby of bored individuals. That thinking is certainly disingenuous. As to the analogy of spending lottery winnings on drugs, I say: WTF?!
The truth is I waver back and forth some days Im 100% no kill. I’ve lost more sleep on the subject because of my actions then any of you. I’ve made peace with my actions besides the occasional nightmare.
Always difficult to say things about the things others say, because no one knows what goes on in someone's head. But, I'll say it anyway: no, Justin Smeja, you do not "waver back and forth some days I'm 1005 no kill." Because if you were 100% no kill, there'd be no wavering.
Friday, September 27, 2013
Tuesday, July 2, 2013
Cryptomundo: Bigfoot Contactees
This is from a little over three years ago: Cryptomundo:Bigfoot Contactees. But the comments are interesting, if not at times, infuriating, because nothing has changed. Like many aspects of the UFO phenomena, the idea that Bigfoot-as-anything-other-than-a-giant-ape gets us nowhere. Of course, that's what they say as well. It's an endless loop -- if someone has supernatural or paranormal experiences involving Bigfoot, then, following the logic inherent in that realm, no physical proof, let alone evidence, exists. Since none exists, such stories are, at best, fanciful accounts created by bored, lonely and even unstable minds, or, at worst, those out to intentionally defraud. The interdiction in these accounts is that no evidence can possibly be collected. Which means, to the flesh and blood adherents, it's all bunk. Which, hint hint, means the phenomena, again like the UFO phenomena and other supernatural events, wants us to believe just that. Oh, those silly tricksters!
The exasperating part of all this is that the refusal of those who insist that Sasquatch is "just" an animal, that there are no such things as fairies, or supernatural entities, that the seeming contradictions within these stories are intentionally contradictory -- as well as elusive -- are not being accurate in their research.
The exasperating part of all this is that the refusal of those who insist that Sasquatch is "just" an animal, that there are no such things as fairies, or supernatural entities, that the seeming contradictions within these stories are intentionally contradictory -- as well as elusive -- are not being accurate in their research.
Monday, July 1, 2013
Sunday, June 30, 2013
The Chairback Pond Bigfoot encounter | Bigfoot Tales
Bigfoot Tales; an encounter from 1908:The Chairback Pond Bigfoot encounter | Bigfoot Tales
Tuesday, June 25, 2013
Tim Marczenko says he wasn’t growing pot, he was searching for Bigfoot | Posted Toronto | National Post
Tim Marczenko says he wasn’t growing pot, he was searching for Bigfoot | Posted Toronto | National Post: A Toronto man claims he was harassed for walking through thick brush in Durham region by a police officer who accused him of being a pot grower.
Tim Marczenko denies the claim, saying he wasn’t growing dope, he was investigating sightings of Bigfoot.
“He asked me, ‘What are you doing out here?’ I told him I was investigating a Bigfoot report and he said, ‘Wow, you’re a terrible liar,’ ” said Mr. Marczenko. ” ‘I know it sounds crazy but I’m not lying about it,’ I said. He kept telling me I was lying about the situation.”
Monday, June 24, 2013
UFOs & Cryptozoology with Stan Gordon on C2C
This is what I live for; UFOs and cryptids. Researcher Stan Gordon is tonight's guest on Coast to Coast, with host George Noory.UFOs and Cryptozoology - Shows - Coast to Coast AMUFOs and Cryptozoology - Shows - Coast to Coast AM
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
Three experts disagree on bonding with a sasquatch - Three experts disagree on bonding with a sasquatch: Members
Very nice article. Arla Williams posted on FB that she did not say BF aren't human, as was reported in the article. Three experts disagree on bonding with a sasquatch - Three experts disagree on bonding with a sasquatch: Members
Tuesday, June 18, 2013
Yowie sighted at Bexhill - witness asks to stay anonymous | Northern Star
Recent Yowie sighting. Thanks to Anomalist for link.
Yowie sighted at Bexhill - witness asks to stay anonymous | Northern Star: CALL it what you will: A Yeren, a Yeti or a Yowie, but the fact remains that people the world over keep seeing these big hairy buggers lurking in the night.
The latest sighting took place recently just north of Bexhill when a Lismore resident and music videographer spied the classic creature crossing a moonlit Bangalow Road.
Monday, June 17, 2013
Friday, June 7, 2013
"...Sasquatch a part of life, no different than raccoons"
From Bizarre Bigfoot, a classically fringe Bigfoot narrative:
"Displaced Bigfoot | Bizarre Bigfoot: We moved in when I was two and by age four or five I considered Sasquatch a part of life and no different than racoons. They are around but meant and did not mean any harm.
I would see one most often when looking out my bedroom window from age 5 on. My mother loved my father and dealt with the area because of that she hated the area and grew up in the city she had one option to avoid boredom that being learning to garden. I remember watching as one would come to the garden and take her crops. She was funny because she did not care and the idea was to pass time not harvest the crops.?
Wednesday, May 15, 2013
Cryptomundo MAY 26th | Portland, Oregon Bigfoot Event: CIA, Spies and Bigfooting with Thom Powell
It's HopsSquatch! May 26th, Portland Oregon. For press release go to Cryptomundo:Cryptomundo MAY 26th | Portland, Oregon Bigfoot Event: CIA, Spies and Bigfooting with Thom Powell
Sunday, May 5, 2013
From JREF: "Bigfoot" **Impossible** and not just non-existent?'
Making this Bigfoot thread 432 millionity:"Bigfoot" **Impossible** and not just non-existent? - JREF Forum. I love that: it's not "just non-existent" but impossible!!! Perfect.
The Circus Returns: 'Film featuring killing of Bigfoot in San Antonio premieres'
Here we go again, with the hucksters and hoaxers manipulating the need in some to kill themselves a Bigfoot. All aspects of Bigfoot research is fair game for para-tainment purposes, including blood lust.
Film featuring killing of Bigfoot in San Antonio premieres | News - Home
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)